TaxLawGHby MSL Business School
MSL Business SchoolTax expenditure intelligence
Ghana Tax Expenditure 2022
The provisional 2022 estimate was GHS 4.805 billion. Import-related tax expenditure represented 72.22% of the total, domestic indirect tax expenditure 19.13%, and domestic direct tax expenditure 8.64%.
Analysed and explained by MSL Business School through TaxLawGH.
2022 answer in brief
GHS 4.805 billion of estimated tax expenditure.
The provisional 2022 estimate was GHS 4.805 billion. Import-related tax expenditure represented 72.22% of the total, domestic indirect tax expenditure 19.13%, and domestic direct tax expenditure 8.64%.
Ministry estimate for the reporting year.
The edition does not provide a directly comparable outturn projection.
Including methodology, schedules and policy discussion.
Composition
Where the estimated revenue forgone arose.
These three categories reconcile to the Ministry's headline total, subject only to rounding.
| Category | GHS million | Calculated share |
|---|---|---|
| Import-related tax expenditure | 3,470.10 | 72.22% |
| Domestic indirect tax expenditure | 919.18 | 19.13% |
| Domestic direct tax expenditure | 415.30 | 8.64% |
Method, scope and limits
What the estimate includes - and what it cannot tell you.
Revenue-forgone method
The edition applies the revenue-forgone method. It compares the tax that would arise under the benchmark system with the liability after an exemption, concession, reduced rate or other preference. Domestic estimates draw on tax-administration records, while import estimates draw on Customs data. The result measures estimated revenue not collected; it does not measure the net economic benefit or behavioural response.
Coverage in this edition
Domestic direct-tax categories include Free Zones, agriculture, agro-processing, non-traditional exports, hotels, rural banks, mining, location incentives and other concessionary treatments. Domestic indirect estimates cover refunds and reliefs, upfront relief and excise preferences. Import categories include government and privileged persons, parliamentary approvals, general Customs exemptions, ECOWAS, investment, petroleum, manufacturing and mining arrangements.
Reporting purpose and framework
The 2022 report describes annual disclosure as a way for policymakers and the public to compare tax preferences with direct spending, examine their cost, distribution and economic effects, and decide whether a preference should continue. It records the reporting framework then relied on by the Ministry, including the Public Financial Management Act and the Revenue Administration Act. This page treats that description as the report's 2022 institutional account, not as a substitute for checking the current text of those Acts.
How to interpret the number
A high estimate can reflect the size of a qualifying activity, the value of the preference, or both. It is not by itself proof that the preference is ineffective.
Edition-specific data limitation
The report identifies incomplete digitisation of domestic-tax data as its express estimation challenge. That matters because the total is only as complete as the tax-administration records available to the team; absence from a schedule is not proof that no relief existed.
What evaluation still requires
A complete assessment needs the policy objective, beneficiaries, duration, counterfactual behaviour, distributional effects, compliance cost and evidence of additional investment or output.
Detailed schedules
Move from the headline to the report's underlying categories.
Tax expenditure from 2020 to 2022
The edition reproduces a three-year series. The table shows the sharp rise in import-related tax expenditure and the lower domestic-direct estimate after 2020.
| Category (GHS m) | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Domestic indirect | 776.37 | 750.76 | 919.18 |
| Domestic direct | 665.97 | 342.35 | 415.30 |
| Import-related | 1,714.21 | 2,388.04 | 3,470.10 |
| Total | 3,156.55 | 3,481.15 | 4,804.58 |
2022 import categories
Amounts below are GHS billions and rounded as presented in the report.
| Import category | GHS bn | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Parliamentary exemptions | 1.49 | Approximately 43% of import tax expenditure |
| General exemptions | 0.80 | Customs Harmonised Code category |
| Government and privileged persons | 0.46 | Institutional and privileged relief |
| GNPC | 0.36 | Upstream petroleum-related category |
| ECOWAS | 0.27 | Regional trade arrangements |
| GIPC | 0.09 | Investment-related category |
| Other categories | 0.01 | Residual amount in the report |
Historical 2023-2026 estimates
These were forecasts made in the 2022 edition. They should not be substituted for later outturns or later-edition estimates.
| Forecast year | Total | Imports | Domestic indirect | Domestic direct | TE/GDP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 5,345.68 | 3,856.34 | 965.13 | 524.21 | 0.82% |
| 2024 | 6,141.12 | 4,461.25 | 1,013.39 | 666.48 | 0.74% |
| 2025 | 7,095.99 | 5,167.64 | 1,064.06 | 864.28 | 0.71% |
| 2026 | 7,264.49 | 5,167.64 | 1,117.26 | 979.59 | 0.64% |
Policy and administration
What the 2022 edition says should change.
- Limit or discontinue exemptions from local taxes.
- Prepare a petroleum list that applies local-content rules.
- Discontinue exemption clauses in commercial contracts.
- Restrict exemption clauses in loan agreements to interest on the loans.
- Remove exemptions for levies and fees that accompany VAT and Customs relief, and remove relief where the justification no longer holds.
- Review mining-industry exemptions and repeal relief for consumption goods not directly related to production.
How to read the report's conclusion
The report concludes that increasing tax expenditure threatens revenue mobilisation and growth. That is the Ministry's policy assessment. The revenue-forgone calculation establishes an estimated fiscal cost, but it does not by itself measure investment, employment, distributional gains or the amount that could actually be collected after behaviour changes.
Continue the research
Connect fiscal cost to the law and the revenue system.
TaxLawGH insights
What matters beyond the headline.
Import relief dominated
Import-related tax expenditure reached GHS 3.470 billion. Parliamentary exemptions were the largest import category, contributing about 43% of the import total.
The burden rose
The report places tax expenditure at 0.85% of GDP and 6.38% of tax revenue, both higher than the corresponding 2021 ratios printed in that edition.
Forecasts are historical
The edition forecast GHS 7.096 billion for 2025 and GHS 7.264 billion for 2026. Those are contemporaneous projections, not current forecasts, and later editions use materially different estimates.
Policy concern
The report highlights project agreements with waiver clauses, possible misuse and incentives to import inputs rather than source available inputs in Ghana.
Reading the evidence safely
Official does not mean internally flawless.
TaxLawGH checks totals, percentages, cross-page consistency and later-edition revisions before presenting a result.
Primary source
Open the official Ministry edition.
2022 Tax Expenditure Report and Estimate for 2023-2026
Published by the Revenue Policy Division of Ghana's Ministry of Finance. TaxLawGH has preserved the source copy used for this analysis while continuing to direct readers to the official Ministry version.
Frequently asked questions
Ghana 2022 tax expenditure
How much was Ghana's tax expenditure in 2022?
The Ministry's 2022 edition records GHS 4.805 billion.
What does tax expenditure mean here?
The Ministry uses a revenue-forgone approach: benchmark tax liability less the liability after an exemption, relief, concession, reduced rate or other preferential treatment.
Is tax expenditure the same as cash spending?
No. It is estimated revenue forgone through the tax system, not a cash payment recorded as ordinary expenditure.
Does this report state current tax law?
No. It is a historical fiscal report. Current legal treatment must be checked against the applicable legislation and effective date.
Why does TaxLawGH identify source discrepancies?
An official report can contain typographical, classification or arithmetic inconsistencies. TaxLawGH discloses them and uses the narrowest figure supported by the source evidence.